No, It’s a Chocolate Mint!

Posted May 21, 2007 By Dave Thomer

I’m not exactly sure what this says about Internet discourse, reading comprehension, pervasive marketing, and overall cynicism. But this story and discussion thread over at Newsarama is well worth reading. Apparently the Franklin Mint – the folks who’ve brought us so many pewter chess sets over the years, one piece every other month – is taking a bunch of quarters and “enhancing” them with images of the Silver Surfer from the upcoming Fantastic 4 movie. People who find these quarters can then enter a contest or something. As you can probably tell from reading the story, the initial details were sketchy and had to be updated later. But it did not take long for folks to start complaining about the government participating in a movie promotion. Now, I can’t quite blame anyone for getting the Franklin Mint and the U.S. Mint confused – but doesn’t it say something that people would have such an easy time believing it?

        

Branded From Birth

Posted May 21, 2007 By Earl Green

Pattie’s recent mention of the latest marketing tendril (tentacle?) to snake outward from Disney’s “Princesses” franchise struck a nerve with me. You see, I’m going to become a dad myself this fall, and even though I’m going to be spending the next few years learning baby talk and then trying to transition that into what I hope will become a solid and fluent grasp of English for my child, I’ve already been mentally filing away “lesson plans,” for lack of a better way to put it, for later, once we’ve (hopefully) established the roots of a command of English. One of the topics burning a hole in the back of my brain is trying to create some sense of awareness of marketing, and a sense of discipline and skepticism about it.

I doubt I’ll have much luck anytime before age 10 or so, of course. I remember what I was like as a kid (and what I’m like now, too, being essentially a big kid, depending on who you ask). I was four when I saw Star Wars for the first time, and five when the figures hit the stores. Oh yeah, baby. I was all over that. My young life (and, therefore, my parents’ budget) hinged on the availability of plastic wookiees and droids. (If I’m to be quite honest, my plastic-wookiee-and-droid lust didn’t abate until after I’d gotten a couple of handfuls of Episode III figures.) I have no doubt my kid’s going to be the same.

But something to keep in mind about my formative years is that the Star Wars marketing story was a bolt-from-the-blue success that nobody expected; certainly not 20th Century Fox, which allowed Lucas to hang on to the merchandising rights for himself, as they figured there was no value in it for them. These days, stuff isn’t just marketed heavily toward children – it’s marketed downright insidiously. While shopping for baby bedding a few weeks back, I snuck a glance at toys aimed more at toddlers – well over a year before I’m even going to need to be thinking about such things – and I was stunned. There have been toy cash registers since I was a wee tot myself, but not with slots to swipe a big plastic credit card. And not just any big plastic credit card, but a plastic credit card with the official Visa logo on it.

Oh, I don’t. Even. Think so.

I had already been looking at the world in a new light, having just recently found out that we’re expecting a boy, and I was already re-examining things like cartoons and children’s programming (and their various and sundry tie-ins) with a new, more skeptical eye. I’ve seen my niece’s collection of Disney princess-related gear grow steadily too, and I’m becoming aware that I’m going to be fighting the opposite number of that trend – one fueled more by testosterone than frills and fantasy. I don’t want to raise my child to be naive, but I don’t want him to be a bully either. There’s got to be a balance. But let me stray a little bit closer to the original point.

It seems that the folks marketing toward kids are sometimes ignoring the ramifications of their message in favor of getting their “brand” out there. When that brand-awareness-from-birth practice grows to include credit cards, I lose track of how many mental alarm bells go off. If you were standing next to me right now, you could catch a glint of red emergency “bubble lights” shining through my ears. Don’t get me wrong, credit cards are tools like any other, capable of helping one in a tight spot, and just as capable of being misused. But the idea that the major credit card vendors are stamping their official logos on toys, and sponsoring educational initiatives on money, aimed at the grade school crowd, the phrase “fox guarding the henhouse” springs instantly to mind, even with all of the acclaim that these efforts have won. It strikes me as being almost as laughable as the Philip Morris company’s bluster about sponsoring anti-smoking education – because all you have to do is watch an hour or so of television to see that Visa and others of their ilk are flying in the face of their own “lessons,” with one recent TV ad campaign – set to the tune of Petula Clark’s “Downtown” – all but coming right out and saying that if you’re feeling just a little blue, get out there and run up that credit card balance. Buy stuff. Feel better.

At least the tobacco companies are barred from getting their counter-education onto the public airwaves.

Even though I know I’m probably a good three years early on this, I guess my question is, to any other parents out there, how do you fight this? Everyone from major credit card vendors to fast food restaurants have already figured out how to get their names and their logos and their products under kids’ noses at school, when we can’t be there to point out the alternatives or the downsides. College age kids are having credit cards pushed to them as soon as they’re on campus, if not before.

I realize that schools seem to be under-funded just about everywhere, making these sponsorships a necessary evil to some districts. And I’m not asking public schools to shoulder the entire burden of teaching fiscal responsibility (here’s an article that makes several good cases against that, in the context of the modern American public school classroom). The American way of life shouldn’t be mom, baseball, apple pie, and consumer debt in one big package – and we shouldn’t be relying on the schools to get that message across when they’ve fallen into the same trap of debt that the rest of us have at one time or another.

Sure, we can ask for policy reforms on this issue, but it doesn’t absolve us of the need to start doing the work at home. This is a case where it looks like we’ll have to reform ourselves to set a better example for our own children.

        

Real Life – with Extra Satellites

Posted May 20, 2007 By Dave Thomer

About a week ago I discovered a long-running webcomic called Real Life, a loosely autobiographical comic done in Illustrator by Greg Dean. The comics and some of the situations are based on Greg’s life, his friends, and his various hobbies. Others are clearly science fiction scenarios played for humor, such as dimension hopping, time travel, and evil geniuses taking over the world. There’s also a healthy amount of metafictional fourth-wall-breaking interactions with The Cartoonist. All in all, it’s quite entertaining. Reading the entire seven-plus years in the archives, I was most struck by Greg’s evolution from a 20-year-old with a serious ramen noodle habit to a culinary school graduate. How’s that for unplanned foreshadowing?

        

Writing About Thinking

Posted May 19, 2007 By Dave Thomer

So we went out to dinner tonight because I had a hankering for tacos, and in the restaurant there was a guy making balloon animals for tips. You can guess what the chances of us leaving the restaurant without a balloon for Alex was. So the guy comes over, sees my Fordham cap, and asks me where Fordham is and what I studied. When I mentioned philosophy, he said that he was studying philosophy out in Pittsburgh, and when I said I had a grad degree, he said he was interested in that as well – and then he asked me if I had published anything. I haven’t, in part because I’ve focused on the education/teaching stuff and in part because there’s a voice in the back of my head saying that my philosophical writing voice just isn’t quite right. My papers never really bowled anyone over during my grad work, and I just couldn’t seem to make it click.

When I got home and checked my e-mail, there was a message from a political science professor whose seminar I took last spring. He was sending me a Word file with comments on my term paper, and as I went through there were a number of little style goofs or bad antecedents or what have you. But at the end there was a comment that the paper was unusually well-written or words to that effect. And this was not the first time a poli sci professor had praised my writing.

All of this has me wondering if I didn’t pick the wrong discipline – that my brain somehow works more smoothly in a political theory direction than a straight-theoretical line. Or it could just be down to individual professors’ preferences. Something to think about as I move forward, anyway.

        

Philly Election Reflection

Posted May 18, 2007 By Dave Thomer

There’s a great post-mortem discussion of the 8th District Council race over at Young Philly Politics. One of the blog’s founders is the son of one of the three candidates who challenged the incumbent; he came in a very close third and the incumbent was re-elected. The discussion thread also includes some thoughts about the at-large council races, where a group of would-be progressive reformers failed to take any of the nominations.

It’s funny, because the headline story of the election is that Philadelphians voted for reform by putting Michael Nutter and Tom Knox first and second in the mayoral election. But 14 out of 17 Council incumbents were re-elected. Two of the ousted three were only recently elected in a special election during which the party ward leaders selected the Democratic candidate, so they did not have as much of a chance to build an incumbency advantage. The third oustee was Juan Ramos, a first-term incumbent with an at-large seat. News reports suggested that Juan Ramos had annoyed some people in the party structure and been cut from their endorsement ballots. Plus Juan Ramos was competing for the Latino vote with another at-large candidate named Ben Ramos who had a better ballot position. Furthermore, the three new Council members all had support from significant parts of the party power structure – they could draw on support from the local electricians’ union, Chaka Fattah’s organization, or some combination thereof.

The takeaway from this, judging from the discussion, is that reformers trying to go it completely alone are likely to get squished. The alternatives seem to be working to create an alternate organizational structure that can compete with the existing power structures, or find ways to become part of that structure. The former option would seem to hold the most promise for reformers to maintain their independence – but it takes time and money that no one seems to have. The latter option isn’t exactly a short term fix either, and it opens you up to having to make compromises.

In my “history sure does rhyme” moments, I find myself thinking about Jane Addams. She tried twice to organize political opposition to the machine boss and got nowhere. Her neighbors just didn’t see the political structure as the same kind of problems that she did, so her organizing efforts failed. I’m not sure I see that changing much in the near future, so I’m more sympathetic to the work-from-within approach and all the compromises that go with it. It’ll be interesting to see to what extent the conversation about 2011 starts now, and what effect that has.

        

Tales from the Thirties

Posted May 17, 2007 By Dave Thomer

I went to an activity day at Alex’s preschool on Wednesday and brought my camera to take some pictures of her with her classmates. The four and five year olds would come up to me and ask me to take their pictures – and then they would reach out to turn the camera around and ask “Can I see the picture?” When I tried to explain that I needed to get the film developed, they just looked at me like I was speaking gibberish. (On the other hand, I got a huge hug and a ‘Daddy! Daddy! I’m so glad you’re here!’ so, y’know, that day rocked.)

When Earl and I started sending electronic correspondence to one another, we would talk about Star Trek or whatever creative writing projects we were working on. Now we discuss our lawn mowers.

Yep. I’m gettin’ old. Now you kids get off my lawn.

        

Extra Sharp Cleese

Posted May 16, 2007 By Dave Thomer

I was flipping through the cable guide some weeks back and found something on PBS called “John Cleese on The Human Face.” I figured it was a documentary special, so I had the DVR record it, and I finally had the time to watch it tonight. I was a little disappointed to discover that it was actually part of a series, and I probably missed the other parts. There wasn’t much humor, but Cleese did a very nice job of weaving some individual stories together to give a general picture of how the brain works with facial information. Cleese himself seemed very comfortable talking to scientists and people who had suffered unfortunate brain accidents – not the kind of personality you’d expect from many of his more famous roles. It was another striking reminder of one of the things that I associate with the British humorists I like – folks like Douglas Adams or the Monty Python troupe or Neil Gaiman. There’s an intellectual or academic flavor to what they do – not that it’s necessarily smarter than other people, but that it seems interested in using the kinds of things we study in school as fodder for material more than the everyday observational stuff that I associate with American humor. Dave Barry, for example, is a heck of a smart guy and a fine writer who graduated from Haverford College, an elite liberal arts school right outside Philly – but most of his stuff covers exploding whales, booger jokes, and terrible song lyrics. So I somehow find it easier to think of Cleese as a documentarian than Barry.

On the other hand, I wish my latest copy of Dave Barry’s Bad Habits hadn’t disintegrated so I could dig up what he had to say about philosophy. But now I digress.

        

Free the Fruit Flies?

Posted May 15, 2007 By Dave Thomer

Interesting story up on Yahoo from Reuters, suggesting that fruit flies may be making “decisions” independently of outside stimuli. The scientists who conducted the study argue that this might be an argument for something along the lines of free will. I will wait for the scientists and neurophilosophers to chime in on the comments, but I’m not sure I fully see the argument. It seems to me that the neurological argument for determinism always took the internal construction of the nervous system into account, and at the very least the Reuters article doesn’t pick up on that. If the different fruit flies had different internal configurations to start with, that would seem to explain the different results. At the very least it strikes me as a potential explanation. And if there is some kind of “purpose” being found in the decision making process of these fruit flies that’s not purely a neurological process, what kind of process is it? And is that process determinist?

        

Cleaning Up Our Elections

Posted May 14, 2007 By Dave Thomer

Spent the day clearing out the garage for the primary tomorrow. If we didn’t host the elections in our district, I don’t know when we’d ever get around to it. Gotta say I’ll be happy when this election’s over and we can start trying to figure out what it all means. And maybe I can get a week or two away from the robo calls.

I’ll update this post tomorrow with some numbers on how many folks in our district voted.

        

That’s a Lotta Plot

Posted May 13, 2007 By Dave Thomer

WARNING – spoilers in the comments!

Saw Spider-Man 3 today. Overall, I liked it. I’m writing the review for the LogBook now. The plot summary for my Spider-Man 2 review was about 275 words long. This time around, it clocks in at 975.

Not that I’m necessarily agreeing with those that think the film was a bit on the overstuffed side. Nosir.

Update: Here’s the LogBook review. This movie is really bringing out the geek in me in that I could spend a lot of time dissecting it, but the one thing I keep coming back to in my head is that I think that this movie did such a bad job showing the Peter/MJ relationship that it calls my attention to the weaknesses of the first two movies in that regard. Very weird.