KNEEL Before Your CD Player

OK, here’s one of those stories that you just knew Dave and I couldn’t let pass by.

A Chicago producer who made a fortune selling CD compilations from radio’s Golden Age has decided to take on the highest of high profile subjects for his next collection: The Bible.

As reported in London’s Guardian a few days ago, the planned set will devote 70 discs to the Old testament and 20 to the New. Production began in July and already features some casting decisions that are…shall we say, creative?

Case in point, the role of God. Look up at the headline again and it’ll come to you. Yup, it’s Terence Stamp. Cross General Zod with Jor-El and evidently you get God. And I ask you, who can argue with that?

The one-hundred-plus member cast also includes Luke Perry as Judas, Marisa Tomei as Mary Magdalene, and Michael York as the narrator.

Jim Caviezel, who played Jesus in Mel Gibson’s Passion of the Christ is a co-producer on this project, titled the Word of Promise. Caviezel is also reprising his role as Jesus. Apparently when the role is that big, fears of typecasting become irrelevant.

Word is that creator (small c) and producer Carl Amari still hasn’t found his Satan but more than one person involved in the project has cast their vote for Simon Cowell.

Also no word as to whether the audio epic will be available on iTunes.

And Though They Did Hurt Me So Bad…

I know that I’ve already posted tonight but I fear that this story has been swallowed up by the news cycle and that’s a shame. For anyone out there who missed Kevin Tillman’s absolutely inspiring testimony about the government’s treatment of his brother Pat‘s death, here it is again.

That the Tillman family had to endure this is a national disgrace. That amidst all of this knowledge, we are letting this administration send troops back for second and third tours in this war is an international tragedy.

And by the way, the title of this post is from the Dire Straits song, Brothers In Arms.

The complete stanza reads:
And though they did hurt me so bad
In the fear and alarm
You did not desert me
My brothers in arms

I Bring You Links

I don’t have a whole lot to say tonight. Fortunately, you can look down a few column inches and see that Pattie’s doing the heavy blog lifting.

But by all means, go check out Keith Olbermann’s latest Special Comment on MSNBC’s site. Those are definitely some questions I want to see asked to Rudy Guiliani during this campaign.

I’m also compiling a list of museums and educational institutions that have teacher resource pages. I’m going to put the whole thing online when I’m done, but for now, take a gander at all of the cool stuff at the National Archives.

Have Fun Storming the Castle

Better late than never, I always say. I saw this article about Disney teaming with a wedding dress designer to create princess-themed wedding dresses for grown-up brides about a week ago but I haven’t had a chance to comment on it until now. (In the interest of full disclosure, as I write this, my five-year old daughter’s heart-shaped Disney Princess plate is sitting on my desk. I believe she used it to snack on some carrots while she was playing games on my PC earlier.)

Having purchased at least one Disney Princess dress-up costume for my own daughter, I couldn’t help but be intrigued by this headline. Is there truly a market for women to wrap themselves in bright yellow tulle (Belle, for those out there in non-Princess homes) or bright pink organza (Sleeping Beauty) on their wedding days? And if so, could Seven Dwarf-themed bridesmaid dresses be far behind?

Never fear, says designer Kirstie Kelley, these gowns will not simply be adult-sized versions of the character dresses already available on DisneyShopping.com. Rather these gowns will “attempt to channel the personality of each princess in terms suitable for a real-life, modern woman.”

Yeah, I didn’t quite get that part either.

Kelly goes on to explain key differences between the Disney Princesses to illustrate (hah!) this point.

A mood and fashion sensibility was assigned to each princess-themed gown: Cinderella is for the classic glamour bride; Sleeping Beauty is about pretty romance; Snow White is sweet elegance; Ariel is sultry allure; Belle is stylish sophistication; and Jasmine is bohemian chic.

“It actually touches on every type of wedding,” explained Kelly, who also has her own bridal couture label. “For the destination wedding there’s Ariel or Jasmine, but if you’re having 500 people in a ballroom, you’re definitely the Cinderella gown.”

Um…okay. That clears that up.

I’m really not sure how I feel about this. I fear that weddings in society have already moved so far into the fantasy realm, especially for women, that many have trouble understanding the difference between “getting married” and “having a wedding”. In fact, much of the wedding industry is built around this “princess for day” sense of entitlement that translates into brides spending thousands of dollars on horse-drawn carriages and swans.

As Susan Jane Gilman wrote in her hysterical and insightful book, Kiss My Tiara:

At age five, I perceived marriage as a dress, a party, and a spotlight. Unfortunately, there’s a whole industry dedicated to perptuating this idrea for females until we’re oh, fifty…. Many woman [have] grown up beleiinvg that their wedding will be “their day” – the most improtant day of their life. The problem was, their wedding day was not just “their day”, but their only day…the one time they were allowed to run the whole damn show, demand exactly what they wanted and be the center of attention.

Maybe that’s what bothers me about the creeping influence of the Disney Princesses in the lives of little girls. With few exceptions, the stories of the princess characters bear little resemblance to realties of love, relationships, romance, and work that they will encounter as they outgrow those brightly colored dress-up gowns. After spending your formative years being fed one ideal of life and love, it’s not hard to imagine that girls are more than a little shaken when they enounter the reality.

Am I reading too much into this? It’s certainly possible, but the fact that the word “princess” comes up hundreds of times during the planning of the average American wedding, makes me think that maybe I’m not. Wth or without Disney-themed dresses, Gilman hits the nail on the head about the wedding industry.

Of course, I can’t simply blame Disney for planting the princess idea into every little girl’s head, and I can’t even claim that I’m immune. I got married in a pale pouffy dress with something that looked suspiciously like a tiara pinned to my head. I can’t deny it. There were witnesses. Of course the best man at this blessed event was named Jennifer but that’s a story for another time.

I suppose it’s all about balance. As Disney becomes more effective at inserting their Princess brand into more and more related products and services, parents of young girls need to be more proactive about supplementing that princess image with other examples of the roles woman play and can still play in society. I realize that it’s hard to compete with pink organza and a marketing budget roughly equal to the GDP of China but we should at least try.

That’s all I have to say on this for now save this last comment: Is anyone else out there as disturbed by the idea of as “Ariel is sultry allure” as I am?

From the It’s the Little Things File

I think we’re finally safely in spring mode. We’ve been able to sleep with the windows open for the last few days. It’s amazing how much good a little fresh, circulating air can do for you. I might shake this cold sometime in the next few weeks!

Another small but heavy thing for me to look forward to – it looks like there are some hefty Making-of books coming out for both the original Star Wars and Spider-Man 3. I have a hunch I’ll be haing some fun with those this summer. Might be time to reinforce the bookshelves again.

Still Falling into the Gap

A quick follow-up to my earlier post which cited stats on the continuing wage gap between men and women, the Associated Press has an article citing a study which shows that the wage gap between equally qualified male and female college-educated workers is evident as early as one year after college and continues to widen over time.

The study, released by the American Association of University Women, found that the women earn 80% of what their male counterparts earn one year after college and 69% of what the men earn ten years after college. Ouch! Moreover, the salaries that women often receive do not reflect their academic acheivements.

Women have slightly higher grade point averages than men in every major, including science and math. But women who attend highly selective colleges earn the same as men who attend minimally selective colleges, according to the study.

Double ouch.

So, the message here is: work hard, study, go tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars into debt to attend an elite school and, Jane, someday you might be able to do the same job as Dick and get paid 30% less.

I visited the organization’s site to check the data and found that they are sponsoring an event called Equal Pay Day for tomorrow, April 24. I really wish I had known about this earlier but it’s still worth looking through the activity guide and checking out the resources. Most are good advice/grassroots action items that can be done anytime. We certainly don’t need a special day to sharpen our salary negotiating skills or help promote financial literacy among the people in our lives, male or female.

I reiterate, this is a topic that’s just screaming for a presidential candidate to make a key part of their platform.

What’s a Column Worth?

One of the big stories in the ongoing downsizing of the Philadelphia Inquirer is the reassignment of columnist Gail Shister, who carved out a beat focusing heavily on local broadcast, network and cable news operations. The leaner, meaner Inquirer apparently felt that this was not something they could spare a writer to do, so they reassigned Shister as a general features reporter whose pieces would appear as needed throughout the paper. This move has generally been panned as a sign of poor decision-making on the Inquirer’s part and something of a mark of disrespect to Shister. On the other hand, on Sunday she had a story on Katie Couric and CBS on the front page of the A&E section that was rather in-depth (a little shorter on specifics than I might have liked) and longer than anything that would have appeared in her column space. If that kind of reporting actually became a hallmark of the Inquirer and Shister’s news assignment, I might consider it a step up.

A Question That Could Cost Me Money

Does anyone happen to know why so few soundtrack songs are available as single tracks from services like Rhapsody and iTunes? There are quite a few tracks that my favorite artists have contributed to various soundtracks over the years and I haven’t quite been willing to pay the full album price for one sing. (Matthew Sweet had a great track on the Can’t Hardly Wait track called “Farther Down” that I’ve been looking for for years, ever since I gave up Napster.) As it is I gotta hope that the artist puts together a greatest-hits or b-sides compilation to try and track it down.

Ah well. Probably not an awful thing that I’m saving a few bucks this way. iTunes is already a vacuum.

A Joyful Noise

Milestones in your child’s life, like most of the parenting experience, often come with a mixed bag of emotions. The one our daughter reached this week is no exception.

One one hand, Alex turned five, certainly a milestone birthday in her mind and ours. We celebrated by taking her to Hershey, PA, specifically the Hershey’s Chocolate World Tour. To say that she enjoyed it is a understatement. She exhibited the kind of joy that we adults seem to lose somewhere around puberty in that she literally shook with excitement. And not just from the chocolate high, either. Even when recounting the trip to her grandma the following day, she was unable to keep her body still for more than a nano-second. She also couldn’t get the words out fast enough to describe it. She was loud, rambling and joyful in way that just stamps down your parental instinct to say “shushâ€? and “use your inside voice.â€? In the end, we just let her go because when your child is exhibiting that kind of excitement and happiness, you really don’t want it to end.

On the other hand, Alex is now five, which means she’ll be leaving the very fine day care facility she currently attends to go to kindergarten in the fall and with that comes an entire host of problems. Choosing a school (which will be the subject of another post, I assure you), navigating the various registration and waiting list pitfalls, and then, finding out that our school options may not offer “extended careâ€? for the hours before and after school when our jobs require us to be someplace other than with Alex. And lets not even get into the cost of these extended care programs when they are available. The entire task is so daunting that I found myself trying to relive the experiences of the previous weekend in my head to remind myself of why we’re doing it all. The answer comes readily: for Alex. We can’t be everywhere at once. We need to provide food, shelter, and health care for her so if finding a school with an extended day care program that covers our working hours takes a pick axe and spelunking helmet, so be it. It needs to be done.

And, the fact is, we’re among the lucky ones. The jobs that Dave and I have provide Alex with health care, money to cover our mortgage, food and clothing, funds for day care and we thankfully still have enough non-working time to actually be parents. Not everyone is so lucky. Millions of parents in this country work long hours to meet the needs of their children and can still come up short. I was reminded of this fact during this same week.

In between driving to open houses, calling schools to ask about extended care, and filling out registration forms, I found myself listening to a radio interview with Kristin Rowe-Finkbeiner, co-founder of Moms Rising, an advocacy group for such “mom� issues as affordable health care, longer and more comprehensive family leave, workplace rights, higher-wages etc. Some of the statistics she cited which caught my ear as I drove to work included:

  • The National Center for Children in Poverty reports that 28 million children in this country are growing up in low-income families. More than 81% of them have at least one working parent whose income is simply not sufficient.
  • The U.S. is one of only five countries of 168 studied that doesn’t mandate some form of paid maternal leave, putting us on par with Papua New Guinea, Lesotho, and Swaziland.
  • A recent study found non-mothers in the U.S. made 90 cents to a man’s dollar, moms made 73 cents to the dollar, and single moms made 56 to 66 cents to a man’s dollar. A study of hiring practices for high wage jobs in 2005 found mothers were offered $11,000 lower starting salaries than equally qualified non-mothers.
  • Statistics from 2001 reveal that a full one-quarter of U.S. families with children under age six earned less than $25,000.
  • More than 40,000 kindergarteners in this country are home alone after school. More than 14,000,000 kindergarteners through twelfth grade kids are on their own after school without supervision.
  • And yes, I did have to pull over and catch my breath after I heard those last ones.

    While I’m not sure I know enough about Moms Rising to endorse them unequivocally, I have to admire their mission. And if it succeeds, the potential is mind-boggling. It’s not simply aiming to be Soccer Moms 2.0. We’re talking less catchy demographic description, and more full-fledged Parental PAC. Our system allows for anyone with an issue, cause, or special interest to try and make their voice heard, for better or for worse. The ones with the deepest pockets are often the loudest, unfortunately. But, every once in a while, with the right coordination and savvy, the weaker succeed by just getting louder.

    And, I ask you, who knows more about volume than parents?

    Parents need to get louder about issues such as affordable heath and child care, education, flexible work schedules, and paid family leave. There are now simply too many social, economic and legal obstacles to being a good parent these days for us not to be as loud as we can be. Too many parents are too bogged down in the realities of simply surviving to provide their children the kind of body-shaking joyful moments that all children deserve to have and all parents deserve to see.

    These days there are a lot of people running around asking to be president. Hang out on YouTube for a while and you can’t miss ’em. Anyway, they’ve all got a lot of special interest groups vying for their attention and they in turn are vying for voters’ attention. They also know that working adults with children under the age of 18 constitute one heck of a voting block.

    What better time to show them what happens when parents stop using their inside voices?