Starting Where You End Up in US History

I’m about to head back to the classroom to get ready for my 18th year of teaching high school students. This time of year puts me into a frame of mind to look back at older lessons and see what I want to tweak and revise. I have a notion to give myself some extra work this year and not just look at my civics and economics lessons for the classes I will be teaching students this year, but also to look at what I did in the years right after the worst of the pandemic when I was teaching students US history. I’m thinking I might package some of that material and post it here on my site. Maybe some teachers will find it useful. Maybe it’ll spark an interesting discussion or two. At the very least it will give me an opportunity to reflect on my work and I hope that will help make me a better teacher.

The reason I want to do this with my US history assignments is that I decided to teach the class by going backward chronologically. We started by talking about what is happening in the US right now, and then each unit went back a few years and tried to talk about some of the decisions and actions that led to the things we had already learned. I had been thinking about this approach for years and I figured, if the disruption of a global pandemic isn’t an opportunity to try an outlandish idea, what is? So I figure this is probably the class where the stuff I have done is different enough from other resources that it’s worth talking about.

Here are some of the reasons that I took the plunge and went with a reverse chronological approach.

FOCUS ON SKILLS: I think this is true for all subjects that we teach students in K-12 education, and I’m certain that it’s true in history: there is more to cover than we can ever hope to cover in one year or even four. But if we can help students develop certain historical thinking skills, we can help them develop a toolbox that they can continue to use for the rest of their lives. The specific content is useful and interesting (to me, at least) in its own right, but its most important function is to give us a space to practice using the skills.

What does teaching about more contemporary history topics have to do with this? The further back in time you go, the more abstract things get to students. (Anyone who has tried to explain to a 2020s teenager what it was like to grow up in the 1980s without a cell phone has an inkling of what I mean here.) Language in the primary documents is going to be a little different. The rhythms of daily life are not the same. What was a contentious issue then doesn’t even raise questions today. So by using more familiar materials, and then gradually showing how the past was different, students can put more of their intellectual energy into building the skills rather than translating the past into the present.

The historical thinking skills I tend to emphasize include:

  • establishing and understanding chronology;
  • identifying and explaining cause and effect relationships;
  • placing primary and secondary sources into context;
  • using evidence from sources to support conclusions;
  • considering how a source reflects the specific perspective of the creator(s) of that source.

LEVERAGE STUDENTS’ CURRENT INTERESTS: When I chose themes for the year, I tried to pick things that I saw students engaging with in their art projects and other activities, from technology to immigration to LGBTQ+ issues and so on. I was trying to set up a framework that would help them tell a more robust story about the world they were engaging in. Now, it’s absolutely true that in many cases, historians can tell a story about the way our modern world operates that stretches back centuries, but I feel like the closer-to-the-present stuff is often more accessible and easier for students to build their making-connections skills.

LEVERAGE MY LIFE EXPERIENCE: The thing about growing older as a teacher is that there is an ever-growing range of material that exists as lived experience for me and Stuff for the History Books for my students. And when you start teaching students about US history from 1600 or 1865, the odds you get to cover a lot of the 1990s and 2000s are pretty low. When I was in school in the 1980s and 1990s, it was a common joke that US history classes would start in colonial or pre-colonial times and then race to try to get through World War II by the end of the year.

Now, that wasn’t great even when I was a kid – I learned relatively little about the Black civil rights movement, Vietnam, Watergate, post-1960s feminism, and a host of other topics compared to, say, the US Civil War or the Gilded Age. But back then I could still pick up references to the 1960s and 1970s in popular media and I was able to pick up some things from context to cover some of the gap.

Now that gap is even wider – if a US history course wraps up around the 1960s, there’s no room to talk about the rise of AIDS, the public introduction of the Internet, the post-Sept. 11 war on terror, the 2008 financial crisis, or a bunch of other things that feel enormously relevant to me but are unknown to my students.

Absolutely, some of this is me getting older and metaphorically waving my fist at the clouds and saying “Kids these days!” along with “I’m still relevant!” But I don’t think it’s a bad idea to teach my students about things that, when they have additional questions, I have a lot of tools in the toolbox to help answer those questions.

INCORPORATE NEWS LITERACY: This part is getting a little harder as many news institutions put their archives behind paywalls (often for understandable reasons). But my curating a set of sources that were reporting on events in real time or close to it, I help introduce my students to some of those institutions and help them get practice at gathering information from a text journalism source.

INCLUSIVE TEACHING: I know teachers can and do discuss the 1600s and 1700s without only focusing on white men. But I do appreciate being able to have students learn about Congress by reading about someone like Patsy Mink or about the intersection of culture and commerce by reading about the development of Black musicians like Philadelphia’s own Gamble and Huff in the 1970s.

I taught students US history with this approach for three years, until I was reassigned to teach them about civics and economics. I would definitely enjoy using this approach again if I ever return to the subject, because I think I was reasonably successful at achieving these goals and I believe I would improve the course with further practice. But if that never happens, I enjoy the teaching I do now as well.

Despite all these reasons, there are definitely reasons to reconsider this approach, and some potential stumbling blocks if you take it on. I wasn’t the only one teaching students US History at my school, so if someone transferred between my class and a colleague’s, that person could have a bumpy ride. And if a 12th grade teacher was counting on all of their students having an identical store of background knowledge, well, I kinda wrecked that hope.

I also had to make sure I didn’t assume students already knew things that I didn’t cover. For example: if I’m going to teach students about what Congress did in 2010 before I ever get a chance to teach them about the drafting of the Constitution, I better make sure I explain what Congress does and how it works at the start of the year.

There are also people in the historical studies field who would probably criticize me for the way I’ve talked about using the study of history as a way to understand the present, rather than viewing the people of the past as people with their own lives and their own ways of seeing the world that we should try to understand and respect in their own right. I have a fairly instrumentalist view of knowledge and learning that connects with my philosophical roots in classical US pragmatism, and I know those views are nowhere close to unanimously shared. So some things that I have set out as priorities might not resonate with other educators. (I should also emphasize that even if I study the past as a way of understanding the present, the study is only going to be useful to the extent that I try to understand the people and events of the past as fully as possible, rather than assume that everyone in the past was essentially running a dress rehearsal for whatever thing I might be thinking about today.)

So I would not call this approach to teaching US history a no-brainer can’t-fail approach. But I think some teachers might find it to be a useful structure. So my goal over the next few months will be to post some of my lesson materials here on Not News, and see if it strikes up any useful conversation.

The Cranky Old Fella Phase of My Career

I’m gonna start this off with some disclaimers because I do not want to appear like I am setting myself up as The Guy Who Is Doing Everything Right and everyone else in US education is Doing It Wrong.

  • I am not criticizing my colleagues or anyone currently teaching students in the classroom.
  • I am not criticizing my students. Heck, I am not criticizing any students anywhere in the world.
  • I am not criticizing the administrators of the school where I teach students or anyone in the day-to-day work of running a school.

What I am doing is trying to point out some trends in education, technology, culture, and politics that have carried all of us to a certain point. I am talking about some things that I have noticed in my own practice. And I am inviting anyone who is reading this to think about how we can be intentional about changing our systems to help take us to a better place.

We are in the midst of a crisis in reading and literacy that is part of a wider crisis in attention in a world that is rapidly shifting to video. I follow a lot of college professors on Bluesky and various newsletters as a way of staying current in my understanding of the fields where I teach students, and many of them have been talking about the difficulty they have been having over the last five years in getting students to keep up with their reading. Personally, I find Paul Musgrave to be one of the best at articulating what’s going on here.

My go-to explanation has been to grumble about how education policies like No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top have influenced this decline over the course of my career. Other people have pointed to the way teachers have been trained to teach kids to read over the last twenty years. But there is also evidence that this is not a problem confined to the United States. And if it is happening in wealthy countries, it shouldn’t be surprising to see signs it is happening in less-wealthy nations as well.

We’re seeing standardized tests scores that are still in decline after the worst of the COVID pandemic. While standardized test data has always been problematic, there are signs that not using that data may be even more problematic, as there is evidence that students are passing courses without having mastered the skills those classes are supposed to teach.

That’s a lot of bad news. But I want to say one thing to try to put these problems in perspective. It is still a relatively new idea in society that we should try to give all young people a substantial formal education. As recently as 1980, almost one third of US adults over the age of 25 did not have a high school diploma. In 1960, about one third of US adults between the ages of 25 and 29 did not have a high school diploma. To try to get that number closer to 90 percent is an enormous undertaking. I think we deserve credit for taking that on as a goal.

That said, I think we have probably been unrealistic about how many resources are necessary to carry out that task successfully. As a result we are constantly trying to scrape through and survive rather than putting ourselves in position to succeed at such an ambitious and worthwhile goal. We got in this situation through many systemic factors, and every individual administrator, teacher, and student is rowing against the tide to try and steer us in a better direction. Working toward systemic change is important, but while that process is happening I still have 140 teenagers to teach every day.

One thing that I have found helpful is that I am embracing my age. I’m 50, and even though I got a late start in my high school teaching career, I have been teaching students for 17 years. (This upcoming school year will, I think, be the last year that my seniors were born before I started teaching high school students.) I am not the guy who’s going to be able to relate to my students well because it wasn’t so long ago that I was in their shoes. I am not the guy who’s immersed in the latest tech and culture trends to be ready to incorporate them into my teaching.

Nope. I’m a Cranky Old Fella now, and while the good old days weren’t always good, I find myself looking back more and more often to see what I did in those days that I can pull forward to today. This is not a fully developed list or method, but these are some of the ideas I have been playing with as I think about how to improve my classroom practice as I get ready for my 18th year teaching high school students.

Stick to Text: I am a print snob. I admit it. And I know that makes me unusual. I know that much of the audience has shifted away from text as audio and video material becomes easier to produce and distribute. But while I believe that spoken language and visual media have much to offer, text has unique advantages in organizing and presenting information, and as educators I think we have to require students to build the skills to make use of those advantages. At some point we have to stop cutting the texts down. We have to require students to build their reading stamina. Those of us teaching students in high school classrooms simply can not leave this for students to figure out in college or on their own. (And this means we need to put real resources and effort into assisting students who have difficulty reading throughout K-12.)

Fewer Grades: I think the trend to have gradebooks available digitally and for lots of classwork assignments to get graded has overall been detrimental to students. I think this trend makes it harder to establish the rhythm and the routine that a series of assignments will culminate in an assessment that requires them to demonstrate understanding. We wind up sending a message that an assignment doesn’t matter if it isn’t graded. We don’t help students build the skills to do long range planning toward a goal. I think I do a better job helping my students do real learning when I give fewer graded assignments, and make sure those assignments require some level of in-depth understanding. (We’ll talk about the Large Language Model elephant in the room another time.)

Keep Analog in the Mix: There’s a lot of trial and error in this for me, because there are some parts of using digital tools in education that I think are, in fact, very helpful. I have made a lot of handouts and worksheets for my students over the years, and when every student had access to a Chromebook I started putting most of that online. I loved spending less money on copy paper. I loved not having to keep track of piles of handouts for when students lost them. I loved not carrying half a ream of paper back and forth to work for grading. I loved not misplacing things that students handed in late. I loved making a comment on a Google Doc rather than trying to squeeze something into tiny letters in the margin. I loved being able to give people a link to follow up and get more info. And I do not want to completely lose all of these advantages. But there are advantages to being able to mark up a piece of paper. There are advantages to writing out your thoughts by hand. And I think developing those analog skills make you better prepared to use digital tools well. So I am thinking about how I can help my students build those skills.

Like I said, everything wasn’t better in the old days. The only thing I unequivocally miss from the 1990s is the prevalence of my favorite rock bands. But I think it’s worth it for teachers to look back and think about school has changed, and talk to each other about whether it’s time to revive some blasts from the past. If you need me, I’ll be in my yard having an amicable conversation with the clouds.

What Am I Doing?

So this is the official Day One of the New Normal of schools being closed. I’m still feeling my way around and trying to develop a routine.

I’ve decided that as long as I have any say over the matter, I am not worrying about doing anything with the expectation that it will be graded. I just have no way of knowing with confidence what every one of my students has the time and opportunity to access. I don’t know how well email and other electronic communication is going to help me give feedback and guidance. I feel queasy about grades under the best circumstances, and these sure aren’t the best circumstances.

That said, for people who are at home and would like some kind of academic activity, I’ve resolved that I’m going to make one post a day on Google Classroom. I’m going to spend a lot of this time trying to figure out what’s going on in the world and also improving my understanding of my subject material. So why not share that process with the students? I’ll share at least one article that I’ve read each day and the questions it raises in my mind. I might even “workshop” some assignments and share them to let students kick the tires.

I’ve been making video lectures for my AP Government class for years. I’m still not quite done. So I think I’ll take this time to write scripts for the last batch I need to do (until they redesign the course again). I used to record the lectures as a sort of stream of consciousness with my notes, but I got tired of watching myself pause to collect my thoughts along with my other verbal filler tics. At least I’ve learned how to turn my iPad into a TelePrompter. (The Pages app has a scrolling display feature.)

If this stretches on for as long as I think it will, I might have to get more ambitious. But for now, let’s all give ourselves time to settle into something that resembles a routine.

EduCon 2.8 Presentation: Back(ground) to Front

I’m currently attending EduCon at Science Leadership Academy. I’ll be hosting a conversation shortly on the importance of background knowledge to doing research.

Here’s the page for the conversation at the EduCon website.

Here’s the Google Slides presentation I’ll be using.

And here’s the Google Doc where I hope a bunch of really great educators are going to share some really great ideas.

Learning to Translate from Wonk

I mentioned earlier that I am teaching a class of 12th graders the AP US Government course.

On one level, I am in my element. All the minutiae of government and politics that I have absorbed since I checked out a book about American presidents from the library in third grade can finally be put to use!

On another level, this is dangerous. I’m trying to package 30 years of reading and experience in a way that high school students who aren’t as fascinated by the government as I am will find relevant and interesting enough to absorb.

I also have mixed feelings about a class that is so expressly focused on performing well on a standardized test. It’s a standardized test that can result in my students getting college credit, which can be a huge academic and financial reward, so it certainly helps with the motivation. But it’s an external motivation.

I try to do the best I can to provide resources and assistance with the material. It’s only my first year, so now that I have taught the course once I think I can do a lot better next year and improve the materials I developed. For example, we’re doing case studies this month to stud how the government has operated in specific cases, and I’d really like to curate a set of readings and have them available on the web early on. Right now I’m doing the initial searching and photocopying a small number of the readings so that I don’t throw too much material out at once. Give me the summer and the chance to hit the ground running and I think we’ll be on to something.

Work in progress that it is, I think the course has been a success this year. I’ve heard students say that they understand what they’re hearing on the news, and talking about how voting in midterm elections is important. (I probably could have flown home under my own power that day.) Most of the credit belongs to the students, who have brought their questions to bear on some fairly dry topics at times. That is, when they don’t steer us completely off topic. But then some of those times have been some of the best conversations of the year.)

Hoping That Doing It Myself Isn’t DIM

I’ve already remarked that I have not had as much time or energy for writing as I would like. In part this is because my teaching assignment changed considerably this year. After teaching 9th graders world history for my first five years as a high school teacher, I have been teaching 12th graders civics and economics, including one section of AP US Government. I also introduced a new elective class in American Studies that I originally hoped to combine recent American history with a study of current American culture but has wound up leaning a lot more toward the former.

In some ways, this has been a very enjoyable challenge. It is absolutely the case that what I am teaching now lines up much more with my prior academic training and outside readings and interest. Teaching 12th graders, many of whom have questions about college and beyond, is an exciting opportunity. (I also like teaching 9th graders who are just getting introduced to high school; it’s interesting to see the start and the conclusion of many students’ high school journey.)

It has also been a great deal of work. I haven’t been satisfied that the textbooks we have on hand are a good fit for our students’ needs or timely enough to be relevant to today’s challenges. So I have spent a lot of time gathering and editing articles from the web or writing my own. I think this has been a worthwhile investment of my time. The danger is that I have replaced a hardcover collection of material my students find impenetrable and irrelevant with a daily anthology of readings with similar issues, but I trust my knowledge of our students enough that I believe I am a doing a better job for them than a textbook writer aiming for a more generic high school audience. If I teach the same classes to my students next year, I hope I will be able to refine and improve the materials over the summer and have more time and energy to focus on helping the students use the material as a springboard to their own inquiry.

To put these materials together I use a laptop that my school provides for me. It’s several years old at this point and it’s starting to show the strain of trying to keep up with the times. Loading web pages and editing Word documents takes a lot longer than it does on my desktop PC. I mutter in frustration at this sometimes, but I have to think about how lucky I am. Were I teaching back in the days when I was in high school, I would not have nearly as many resources open to me from almost any location with only a few minutes’ wait.

Doesn’t stop me from staring with envy at the new laptops when I walk into an Apple Store, but it does help give some perspective.

Ferguson Shows That History Class Needs to Question

Yesterday I read two articles covering complaints about the revised Advanced Placement U.S. History exam. The National Association of Scholars and the Republican National Committee both attacked the revisions for promoting a negative vision of United States history, such as an emphasis on the racial hierarchy established in colonial times.

Last night and well into this morning, I was constantly refreshing Twitter to see what was happening in Ferguson, MO. If you’re not up to speed on the events, there’s a very good primer on Vox. Since Michael Brown was shot and killed by a Ferguson police officer, residents have been gathering to protest, and the Ferguson and St. Louis County police have been very aggressive in their tactics – using tear gas, arresting reporters, and bringing out a lot of guns and armor.

There are a lot of lessons we need to learn from what’s going on in Ferguson, but one of them is that although we should not do so exclusively, we need to emphasize the negative aspects of America’s history, because they are influencing our present and so many people in positions of power do not see this. I have read the AP framework, and it does not ignore the idea that America’s leaders helped create a government that helped move justice and a government of rights forward. But neither does it ignore that they built that nation on territory occupied by other people, or that there has been an ongoing struggle to extend that nation’s protections and privileges to all its people. We need both sides of the story, and we need to understand that for all the positive legacy of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, the negative legacy of slavery, racism, inequality, and exclusion also lives on today. Injustice compounds and festers, even after its most obvious signs have been swept away. It creates situations where many people feel ostracized and under threat from the very society that they live in. Then others, who are more comfortable with the status quo, are unable to see where that pain comes from because they believed the problems were all (or mostly) solved in the past and so everyone should just be able to carry on now without having to respond to what went on before.

Ta-Nehisi Coates’ essay on the case for reparations earlier this year tried to bring that point home, and a lot of people tried to push it away. Ongoing discussions across social media and activist networks about privilege demonstrate a lack of understanding and empathy. Statistics about the unequal treatment that our criminal justice system gives to Caucasians and minorities pile up until we are numb. And then we see the powder keg explode in a town like Ferguson, where a mostly-white police force is alienated from the largely-black community that it is supposed to serve.

I’ve made no secret of my fondness for John Dewey, and one of his ideas that sticks with me is that education is the process through which society decides what part of itself to pass on to the next generation. Implicit in that is the idea that there are some parts that we do not want to pass on, that the generation to come will build a better society than the one we have today. That means we need to be able to challenge our students’ assumptions and preconceived notions, while we help them develop the skills to critically examine the messages that society sends.

For students who come from a position of privilege (as a lot of AP students are), that is tricky. We will often be challenging things they have learned from their families and their communities. Students may feel like we are trying to make them feel guilty, or accusing them of being biased or cruel themselves because of the biased and cruel actions of others. The idea of a social responsibility may seem at odds with the ethic of individual responsibility that we often want them to assume. This kind of teaching requires us to be challenging and supportive simultaneously, which means we need to create a good rapport and safe environment with our students, and help them establish it with each other.

Students from disempowered groups may not need a history class to help them understand inequality in America, but they need support too. If the classroom can be a supportive and pluralistic environment, then that helps create a model that the students can work to recreate in society. The history of injustice must be married with the stories of resistance to that injustice, and the story of imperfect progress should be brought forward to the present day so that students have a reason to believe not only that present injustice is unacceptable but that something can be done about it. And then we need to help empower students to demand that change. Many of our students are already learning how to harness social media to empower citizens, but that needs to expand to understanding our electoral system, identifying who has political influence, seeing how they use it, and so on.

Together, these students can become the citizenry that demands accountability from their elected officials, that exercises power with empathy and wisdom, and that brings more justice to an ever more perfect union. And as they do, I hope that they will teach us how to do so as well.

(This post was revised several hours after initial posting to add some links and clarifying details.)

Not About Me

I remember being in grad school and frequently being frustrated in classes where the professor didn’t say a lot. This was especially true in political science courses, where I was trying to catch up with a lot of literature on democracy and political institutions that was really interesting, but a bit out of my background. (I took a couple of poli sci classes as an undergrad, but decided not to major in it for a variety of reasons.) I figured that the prof had spent a lot more time studying and thinking about the literature and the subject than I had, or than my classmates had, and in that two or three seminar window, I wanted to use that resource to streamline my own knowledge-building as much as possible. I had done the reading, I had my own thoughts and criticisms, and if someone else had either made them or refuted them, that would be very helpful. I had questions about how the research in the reading had been followed-up upon, and the prof was far more likely to know of the rest of the literature than I was. Now, it’s possible that I was, and am, too likely to defer to experts and credentials. But in my mind, that expert with that credential was the reason I was paying money to take that class and not just getting a reading list on my own and finding a discussion group on the Internet.

I think about this a lot these days because now that I am a teacher, I have to make a conscious effort not to simply be the kind of teacher that I liked most when I was a student. Don’t get me wrong, I take a lot of my inspiration from my own teachers and try to steal as many tricks from the good ones as I can. But not every student is looking for an explainer, or a source of lousy puns, or whatever I was looking for from my teachers. And they deserve the best I can give them, too. They might deserve it, and need it, even more than the students who are more on my wavelength. (And I may be going out onto a very thin branch with this whole “deserving” theme, because I don’t want to suggest that some students are less deserving of a good education, but bear with me for a minute.)

The thing is, I kind of hit a certain genetic/environment jackpot, in that the things I was good at and interested in as a kid are the things that society was going to force me to do anyway. And the things that I was less skilled at and less interested in were things that society let me pursue or abandon as I saw fit. I like reading, I like memorizing stuff, I like writing, and so on. So the fact that I had to do this for seven hours a day didn’t bug me too much, and overall society has rewarded me for this. If, on the other hand, I had been forced to spend seven hours a day exercising and learning how to play various sports, I might have been a little crankier and inclined to slack off. When I literally batted .000 during a season playing baseball for the local Y, I just stopped playing, spent more time reading, and that was that. Students who don’t like school or have less developed “school skills” don’t have the option of leaving the history team to spend more time on their basketball homework. It’s important for me to keep a strong sense of empathy, look for ways to make the history team work a little better, and be the teacher that they need, not the teacher that my current vision of my 14-yer-old self wanted.

Educon Presentation: Supporting Democracy Beyond Content

I will be leading a conversation about how our schools can support democracy at EduCon in about an hour. I may edit this post with some reflections after the fact, but for now I want to make sure there’s an easily accessible link to the Google documents we’ll be using.

Here’s the slide set.

Here’s a document for sharing visions and definitions of democracy.

Here’s a document for sharing ideas about the skills citizens need in a democracy.

Here’s a document for planning some changes we can make to our schools and communities to help people build those skills.