|
Author
|
Topic: Left on Target (April 2001)
|
Kevin Ott True Believer
|
posted 04-04-2001 12:09 AM
This month's Culture & Media story is now online. |
Pattie Gillett True Believer
|
posted 04-04-2001 12:10 AM
First of all, Kevin's description of bad political cartoons is hysterical and pretty damn accurate. It seems like every political cartoonist studied out of the same textbook about Thomas Nast and stopped there. Now Nast was influential and important in his time but wasn't that like, 70 years ago? Secondly, I found it interesting that Bateman draws his own life in political cartoons. It definitely shows a different understanding of what is and is not "political." Many people think of "political stuff" as what happens in Washington or their state capital, something separate from themselves. This is yet another reason why people don't like to talk about politics. If we're going to be literal about etymology, political is anything that affects us as a community. Makes perfect sense to me. Moreover, doesn't drawing abstracted giant whales and caricatures of figures just serve to further disconnect these figures from us? The whole less human thing and all. I'm just saying. Thirdly, who is Steve Keene? I feel like I missed something here.
|
Dave Thomer Guardian of Peace and Justice in the Galaxy
|
posted 04-04-2001 12:11 AM
I didn't know Scott Bateman's name until I read this story, but I did recognize his style from the editorial pages of my local newspaper. Now that I've perused his website and learned a bit more about him, I'll be keeping my eyes open for his stuff in the future, and not just because he's hit on a number of the same topics that we have here at Not News. I've long been a fan of the Philadelphia Inquirer's Tony Auth, who does tend to use a lot of the visual metaphors that Kevin decries, but I also appreciate someone who can boil some of these issues down to a solid, concise punch line. It really illustrates the idiocy that gets passed off as decision-making in this world when a policy or a cultural trend can be mocked in such a small space, and it illustrates the problem that we keep coming back to here - people just aren't thinking things through.That said, there are some reasons for optimism in the interview. For starters, say what you will about Corporate America calling the shots, it's pretty darned cool that a guy like Bateman makes a living skewering the actions of our government and institutions. I'd love it if we as a society were a little more receptive and responsive to that criticism, but it's a start, and a good one. Also, it's worth noting that our system and our society puts tools like Flash into Bateman's hands, making it easier and cheaper for artists to create and distribute their work. Heck, I'm sitting here in an apartment in Philadelphia with more processing power than some businesses may have had ten or twenty years ago, and hopefully using it to do some good and have some fun along the way. There's something to be said for that. I also have to admit, Bateman's comments about Nader and third parties struck a chord with me, but that's a debate we can get into elsewhere . . .
| |