<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Time Crunch of Deliberation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.notnews.org/philosophy/the-time-crunch-of-deliberation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.notnews.org/philosophy/the-time-crunch-of-deliberation/</link>
	<description>Philosophy, public affairs and pop culture.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 02:35:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Thomer</title>
		<link>http://www.notnews.org/philosophy/the-time-crunch-of-deliberation/#comment-8782</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Thomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 03:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notnews.org/philosophy/the-time-crunch-of-deliberation.html#comment-8782</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;m trying desperately to stay on the horse.

I think that if you go to a caucus, it feels more like you&#039;re doing something. (Which reminds me, I need to finish up my post on &quot;Why Voting Is an Irrational Act.&quot; But it&#039;s a more demanding process, so fewer people go. And if fewer people participate, does that serve democracy?

I have no trouble with the idea that if you want democracy you have to work a little for it, but I don&#039;t think that&#039;s the common attitude in our society.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m trying desperately to stay on the horse.</p>
<p>I think that if you go to a caucus, it feels more like you&#8217;re doing something. (Which reminds me, I need to finish up my post on &#8220;Why Voting Is an Irrational Act.&#8221; But it&#8217;s a more demanding process, so fewer people go. And if fewer people participate, does that serve democracy?</p>
<p>I have no trouble with the idea that if you want democracy you have to work a little for it, but I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s the common attitude in our society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robn</title>
		<link>http://www.notnews.org/philosophy/the-time-crunch-of-deliberation/#comment-8774</link>
		<dc:creator>Robn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 09:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notnews.org/philosophy/the-time-crunch-of-deliberation.html#comment-8774</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m so glad to see you&#039;re blogging again, and doing analysis of the way US &quot;democracy&quot; works.  I haven&#039;t got the stomach to look to closely at it myself these days, but I can appreciate the 2nd hand analysis this way!

I had friends that caucused in WA state recently - it was my first experience with a caucus over a primary, and I really enjoyed hearing about the process.  It seemed significantly more democratic and just plain empowering than the primaries I&#039;m used to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so glad to see you&#8217;re blogging again, and doing analysis of the way US &#8220;democracy&#8221; works.  I haven&#8217;t got the stomach to look to closely at it myself these days, but I can appreciate the 2nd hand analysis this way!</p>
<p>I had friends that caucused in WA state recently &#8211; it was my first experience with a caucus over a primary, and I really enjoyed hearing about the process.  It seemed significantly more democratic and just plain empowering than the primaries I&#8217;m used to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

