<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for This Is Not News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.notnews.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.notnews.org</link>
	<description>Philosophy, public affairs and pop culture.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on You Know You&#8217;re a Derelict Blogger When . . . by Dave Thomer</title>
		<link>http://www.notnews.org/s-o-s/you-know-youre-a-derelict-blogger-when.html#comment-9008</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Thomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 23:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notnews.org/s-o-s/you-know-youre-a-derelict-blogger-when.html#comment-9008</guid>
		<description>Pattie watches Top Chef and a lot of the other skill-competition reality shows, and I'll follow along some times. We just got a new TV, so I have a feeling it's going to be a lot more compelling pretty quickly. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pattie watches Top Chef and a lot of the other skill-competition reality shows, and I&#8217;ll follow along some times. We just got a new TV, so I have a feeling it&#8217;s going to be a lot more compelling pretty quickly. <img src='http://www.notnews.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You Know You&#8217;re a Derelict Blogger When . . . by rjmason</title>
		<link>http://www.notnews.org/s-o-s/you-know-youre-a-derelict-blogger-when.html#comment-8948</link>
		<dc:creator>rjmason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 02:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notnews.org/s-o-s/you-know-youre-a-derelict-blogger-when.html#comment-8948</guid>
		<description>TV I enjoyed this year: Dexter (on DVD).  American Idol (socially; I wouldn't watch it alone).  Top Chef (my favorite reality show).  How I Met Your Mother.  House M.D.  The Big Bang Theory (it's not always good, but sometimes it's true to life).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TV I enjoyed this year: Dexter (on DVD).  American Idol (socially; I wouldn&#8217;t watch it alone).  Top Chef (my favorite reality show).  How I Met Your Mother.  House M.D.  The Big Bang Theory (it&#8217;s not always good, but sometimes it&#8217;s true to life).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Time Crunch of Deliberation by Dave Thomer</title>
		<link>http://www.notnews.org/philosophy/the-time-crunch-of-deliberation.html#comment-8782</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Thomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 03:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notnews.org/philosophy/the-time-crunch-of-deliberation.html#comment-8782</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I'm trying desperately to stay on the horse.

I think that if you go to a caucus, it feels more like you're doing something. (Which reminds me, I need to finish up my post on "Why Voting Is an Irrational Act." But it's a more demanding process, so fewer people go. And if fewer people participate, does that serve democracy?

I have no trouble with the idea that if you want democracy you have to work a little for it, but I don't think that's the common attitude in our society.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m trying desperately to stay on the horse.</p>
<p>I think that if you go to a caucus, it feels more like you&#8217;re doing something. (Which reminds me, I need to finish up my post on &#8220;Why Voting Is an Irrational Act.&#8221; But it&#8217;s a more demanding process, so fewer people go. And if fewer people participate, does that serve democracy?</p>
<p>I have no trouble with the idea that if you want democracy you have to work a little for it, but I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s the common attitude in our society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Indulge Me for a Moment by ademarrakowsky</title>
		<link>http://www.notnews.org/s-o-s/indulge-me-for-a-moment.html#comment-8780</link>
		<dc:creator>ademarrakowsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notnews.org/s-o-s/indulge-me-for-a-moment.html#comment-8780</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave,

Not being a regular blog participant (I normally just read blogs), it didn't occur to me that you may have replied to my comment above via your blog, hence my 7.5-month-belated response.

You touch upon two issues:

First, the quid pro quo aspect of indulgences.

Second, the natrure of Purgatory and how one comes to perfection therein.

At the heart of both is God's respect for our free will and His desire that we actually own what He gives us.  

Because of His respect for our free will, He asks us for some action on our part, however token, to indicate -- primarily to us --  that we're serious about receiving what He's offering us.  He won't give us anything without our cooperation with it.  That's why indulgences require some action of response, and why Purgatory is a process: processes rerquire responding.

But that's only part of the picture.  Being omniscient and omnipotent, God can give us indulgences and Heaven in a flash if He so desires.  However, just as anyone who's worked hard and is resting satisfied with the results will tell you, there's a deep satisfaction in owning something that you've worked for -- a deeper satisfaction than in simply receiving it as a handout -- that's the effectiveness of the token prices in thrift stores.  That's why indulgences require some at least small action to obtain them, and that's why God's grace doesn't simply lift a soul out of Purgatory as soon as he or she enters it.

Related to the ownership is how we come to own -- our effort creates.  Being made in God's image, we're capable of creation (from pre-existing stuff, though, unlike God).. That's why when you look back on 50 years of marriage with 5 grown children and 11 grandkids, your satisfaction is not only from the ownership that came from all that struggle and sacrifice that made your relationship with your wife  last as well as the maturing of your kids possible, but all that effort was an act of creation -- doing what God does -- something that wasn't there before you got to work on it now is there..  Purgatory is such a state, too:   He allows you to change yourself  -- it's an active, not passive state -- so that you can be ready to live the life of joy in Heaven.

Now it's important to remember that our ability to create and to cooperate with God are His gifts -- no Pelagian nonsense here -- but His desire is that we, in receiving His gifts, come to own them as our very own.

I hope that answers a few questions.  

God bless you, Dave!

Ademar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave,</p>
<p>Not being a regular blog participant (I normally just read blogs), it didn&#8217;t occur to me that you may have replied to my comment above via your blog, hence my 7.5-month-belated response.</p>
<p>You touch upon two issues:</p>
<p>First, the quid pro quo aspect of indulgences.</p>
<p>Second, the natrure of Purgatory and how one comes to perfection therein.</p>
<p>At the heart of both is God&#8217;s respect for our free will and His desire that we actually own what He gives us.  </p>
<p>Because of His respect for our free will, He asks us for some action on our part, however token, to indicate &#8212; primarily to us &#8212;  that we&#8217;re serious about receiving what He&#8217;s offering us.  He won&#8217;t give us anything without our cooperation with it.  That&#8217;s why indulgences require some action of response, and why Purgatory is a process: processes rerquire responding.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s only part of the picture.  Being omniscient and omnipotent, God can give us indulgences and Heaven in a flash if He so desires.  However, just as anyone who&#8217;s worked hard and is resting satisfied with the results will tell you, there&#8217;s a deep satisfaction in owning something that you&#8217;ve worked for &#8212; a deeper satisfaction than in simply receiving it as a handout &#8212; that&#8217;s the effectiveness of the token prices in thrift stores.  That&#8217;s why indulgences require some at least small action to obtain them, and that&#8217;s why God&#8217;s grace doesn&#8217;t simply lift a soul out of Purgatory as soon as he or she enters it.</p>
<p>Related to the ownership is how we come to own &#8212; our effort creates.  Being made in God&#8217;s image, we&#8217;re capable of creation (from pre-existing stuff, though, unlike God).. That&#8217;s why when you look back on 50 years of marriage with 5 grown children and 11 grandkids, your satisfaction is not only from the ownership that came from all that struggle and sacrifice that made your relationship with your wife  last as well as the maturing of your kids possible, but all that effort was an act of creation &#8212; doing what God does &#8212; something that wasn&#8217;t there before you got to work on it now is there..  Purgatory is such a state, too:   He allows you to change yourself  &#8212; it&#8217;s an active, not passive state &#8212; so that you can be ready to live the life of joy in Heaven.</p>
<p>Now it&#8217;s important to remember that our ability to create and to cooperate with God are His gifts &#8212; no Pelagian nonsense here &#8212; but His desire is that we, in receiving His gifts, come to own them as our very own.</p>
<p>I hope that answers a few questions.  </p>
<p>God bless you, Dave!</p>
<p>Ademar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Indulge Me for a Moment by ademarrakowsky</title>
		<link>http://www.notnews.org/s-o-s/indulge-me-for-a-moment.html#comment-8779</link>
		<dc:creator>ademarrakowsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notnews.org/s-o-s/indulge-me-for-a-moment.html#comment-8779</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave,

Not being a regular blog participant (I normally just read blogs), it didn't occur to me that you may have replied to my comment above via your blog, hence my 7.5-month-belated response.

You touch upon two issues:

First, the quid pro quo aspect of indulgences.

Second, the natrure of Purgatory and how one comes to perfection therein.

At the heart of both is God's respect for our free will and His desire that we actually own what He gives us.  

Because of His respect for our free will, He asks us for some action on our part, however token, to indicate -- primarily to us --  that we're serious about receiving what He's offering us.  He won't give us anything without our cooperation with it.  That's why indulgences require some action of response, and why Purgatory is a process: processes rerquire responding.

But that's only part of the picture.  Being omniscient and omnipotent, God can give us indulgences and Heaven in a flash if He so desires.  However, just as anyone who's worked hard and is resting satisfied with the results will tell you, there's a deep satisfaction in owning something that you've worked for -- a deeper satisfaction than in simply receiving it as a handout -- that's the effectiveness of the token prices in thrift stores.  That's why indulgences require some at least small action to obtain them, and that's why God's grace doesn't simply lift a soul out of Purgatory as soon as he or she enters it.

Related to the ownership is how we come to own -- our effort creates.  Being made in God's image, we're capable of creation (from pre-existing stuff, though, unlike God).. That's why when you look back on 50 years of marriage with 5 grown children and 11 grandkids, your satisfaction is not only from the ownership that came from all that struggle and sacrifice that made your relationship with your wife  last as well as the maturing of your kids possible, but all that effort was an act of creation -- doing what God does -- something that wasn't there before you got to work on it now is there..  Purgatory is such a state, too:   He allows you to change yourself  -- it's an active, not passive state -- so that you can be ready to live the life of joy in Heaven.

Now it's important to remember that our ability to create and to cooperate with God are His gifts -- no Pelagian nonsense here -- but His desire is that we, in receiving His gifts, come to own them as our very own.

I hope that answers a few questions.  

God bless you, Dave!

Ademar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave,</p>
<p>Not being a regular blog participant (I normally just read blogs), it didn&#8217;t occur to me that you may have replied to my comment above via your blog, hence my 7.5-month-belated response.</p>
<p>You touch upon two issues:</p>
<p>First, the quid pro quo aspect of indulgences.</p>
<p>Second, the natrure of Purgatory and how one comes to perfection therein.</p>
<p>At the heart of both is God&#8217;s respect for our free will and His desire that we actually own what He gives us.  </p>
<p>Because of His respect for our free will, He asks us for some action on our part, however token, to indicate &#8212; primarily to us &#8212;  that we&#8217;re serious about receiving what He&#8217;s offering us.  He won&#8217;t give us anything without our cooperation with it.  That&#8217;s why indulgences require some action of response, and why Purgatory is a process: processes rerquire responding.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s only part of the picture.  Being omniscient and omnipotent, God can give us indulgences and Heaven in a flash if He so desires.  However, just as anyone who&#8217;s worked hard and is resting satisfied with the results will tell you, there&#8217;s a deep satisfaction in owning something that you&#8217;ve worked for &#8212; a deeper satisfaction than in simply receiving it as a handout &#8212; that&#8217;s the effectiveness of the token prices in thrift stores.  That&#8217;s why indulgences require some at least small action to obtain them, and that&#8217;s why God&#8217;s grace doesn&#8217;t simply lift a soul out of Purgatory as soon as he or she enters it.</p>
<p>Related to the ownership is how we come to own &#8212; our effort creates.  Being made in God&#8217;s image, we&#8217;re capable of creation (from pre-existing stuff, though, unlike God).. That&#8217;s why when you look back on 50 years of marriage with 5 grown children and 11 grandkids, your satisfaction is not only from the ownership that came from all that struggle and sacrifice that made your relationship with your wife  last as well as the maturing of your kids possible, but all that effort was an act of creation &#8212; doing what God does &#8212; something that wasn&#8217;t there before you got to work on it now is there..  Purgatory is such a state, too:   He allows you to change yourself  &#8212; it&#8217;s an active, not passive state &#8212; so that you can be ready to live the life of joy in Heaven.</p>
<p>Now it&#8217;s important to remember that our ability to create and to cooperate with God are His gifts &#8212; no Pelagian nonsense here &#8212; but His desire is that we, in receiving His gifts, come to own them as our very own.</p>
<p>I hope that answers a few questions.  </p>
<p>God bless you, Dave!</p>
<p>Ademar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Time Crunch of Deliberation by Robn</title>
		<link>http://www.notnews.org/philosophy/the-time-crunch-of-deliberation.html#comment-8774</link>
		<dc:creator>Robn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 09:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notnews.org/philosophy/the-time-crunch-of-deliberation.html#comment-8774</guid>
		<description>I'm so glad to see you're blogging again, and doing analysis of the way US "democracy" works.  I haven't got the stomach to look to closely at it myself these days, but I can appreciate the 2nd hand analysis this way!

I had friends that caucused in WA state recently - it was my first experience with a caucus over a primary, and I really enjoyed hearing about the process.  It seemed significantly more democratic and just plain empowering than the primaries I'm used to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so glad to see you&#8217;re blogging again, and doing analysis of the way US &#8220;democracy&#8221; works.  I haven&#8217;t got the stomach to look to closely at it myself these days, but I can appreciate the 2nd hand analysis this way!</p>
<p>I had friends that caucused in WA state recently - it was my first experience with a caucus over a primary, and I really enjoyed hearing about the process.  It seemed significantly more democratic and just plain empowering than the primaries I&#8217;m used to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shaking the Rust Off by Dave Thomer</title>
		<link>http://www.notnews.org/s-o-s/shaking-the-rust-off.html#comment-8029</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Thomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 03:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notnews.org/s-o-s/shaking-the-rust-off.html#comment-8029</guid>
		<description>Yeah, the thought has occurred to me that I have a five year head start in accumulating and shaking off said cobwebs. :)

This blog post was a serious case of tempting fate, let me tell you. The next morning, the bus we usually take was early, so I got to see that go part the bus stop while we were half a block away. So we commenced with the piggyback up the street to Bus Stop #2 - carrying this month's contribution to the classroom snacks and supplies stash - only to find that the backup bus was running late. It finally came, we hopped off at school and ran into the yard, and got kiddo in line just as her class started moving.

Dave 15 - Late Slips 0. Darnit, I'm goin' for the shutout if it kills me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the thought has occurred to me that I have a five year head start in accumulating and shaking off said cobwebs. <img src='http://www.notnews.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>This blog post was a serious case of tempting fate, let me tell you. The next morning, the bus we usually take was early, so I got to see that go part the bus stop while we were half a block away. So we commenced with the piggyback up the street to Bus Stop #2 - carrying this month&#8217;s contribution to the classroom snacks and supplies stash - only to find that the backup bus was running late. It finally came, we hopped off at school and ran into the yard, and got kiddo in line just as her class started moving.</p>
<p>Dave 15 - Late Slips 0. Darnit, I&#8217;m goin&#8217; for the shutout if it kills me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shaking the Rust Off by Earl Green</title>
		<link>http://www.notnews.org/s-o-s/shaking-the-rust-off.html#comment-8027</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notnews.org/s-o-s/shaking-the-rust-off.html#comment-8027</guid>
		<description>Make ya a deal - as soon as I can shake the cobwebs outta my head from the 3am diaper changes and feedings, I'll say something coherent in response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Make ya a deal - as soon as I can shake the cobwebs outta my head from the 3am diaper changes and feedings, I&#8217;ll say something coherent in response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on All About the Music by Dave Thomer</title>
		<link>http://www.notnews.org/culture/all-about-the-music.html#comment-7674</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Thomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 04:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notnews.org/culture/all-about-the-music.html#comment-7674</guid>
		<description>On the way out of the Mann, Pattie and I were saying that next time they tour, we're resorting to kidnapping if necessary, 'cause it just ain't right if you don't see these guys in action.

The live CD I bought for Liam is available from &lt;a href="http://www.kufala.com/artists/show.php?catnum=183" rel="nofollow"&gt;Kufala&lt;/a&gt;, the company that's also releasing the Crowded House shows. Although, unfortunately, it looks like the venue didn't allow them to record the Philly show for release. 

Although, y'know, if I were you, I wouldn't be rushin' to buy it, just in case there were already a copy of it earmarked for you. Just saying.

On Liam and Neil - Neil's managed to be in show biz and keep a marriage going for 20+ years, so I know how he feels about family. But y'know, I love my mom and siblings dearly, but if we ever had to collaborate on some kind of creative endeavor, everyone involved would be insane within a matter of days. It takes us a month to order baseball tickets, for crying out loud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the way out of the Mann, Pattie and I were saying that next time they tour, we&#8217;re resorting to kidnapping if necessary, &#8217;cause it just ain&#8217;t right if you don&#8217;t see these guys in action.</p>
<p>The live CD I bought for Liam is available from <a href="http://www.kufala.com/artists/show.php?catnum=183" rel="nofollow">Kufala</a>, the company that&#8217;s also releasing the Crowded House shows. Although, unfortunately, it looks like the venue didn&#8217;t allow them to record the Philly show for release. </p>
<p>Although, y&#8217;know, if I were you, I wouldn&#8217;t be rushin&#8217; to buy it, just in case there were already a copy of it earmarked for you. Just saying.</p>
<p>On Liam and Neil - Neil&#8217;s managed to be in show biz and keep a marriage going for 20+ years, so I know how he feels about family. But y&#8217;know, I love my mom and siblings dearly, but if we ever had to collaborate on some kind of creative endeavor, everyone involved would be insane within a matter of days. It takes us a month to order baseball tickets, for crying out loud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on All About the Music by Earl Green</title>
		<link>http://www.notnews.org/culture/all-about-the-music.html#comment-7672</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 20:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notnews.org/culture/all-about-the-music.html#comment-7672</guid>
		<description>Man, I really wish I could've seen this one.  (Not that Dave didn't repeatedly offer to put me up while I would've hypothetically been in town, but as much as I love both Crowded House and Pete Yorn, I thought that traipsing off cross-country for a rock concert when my wife is having pregnancy complications would be Bad Form.)

The clarinet/keyboard gadget is most likely an EWI, or Electronic Wind Instrument.  It takes the pressure data from a woodwind-style mouthpiece and uses it to modify the output parameters for softness/loudness/etc. for MIDI-driven samples.  A really cool concept, but I gave up lusting after an EWI ages ago when I realized that this meant you'd have to be an excellent keyboardist (which I really can't claim to be) and a decent woodwind player (which I ain't).  They're great for making sampled wind instrument sounds come across more realistically.

And I'm not surprised one bit by Neil being able to live on the road with Liam.  Now, bear in mind, Liam's old enough to not be living at home anymore, but even more than that, in Neil, we're talking about someone who has written whole albums around family relationships.  It's obviously a subject of deep importance to him.

Hey Dave, did Liam's CD have a URL or anything like that on it where a poor sod like me who couldn't make it to the concert might order a copy?  Or is that info on the MySpace site that I probably should've looked at before asking this?  I really liked Liam's worth with Betchadupa, and I've got a darn good start on a complete collection of Finn family CDs.  No point in falling behind now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, I really wish I could&#8217;ve seen this one.  (Not that Dave didn&#8217;t repeatedly offer to put me up while I would&#8217;ve hypothetically been in town, but as much as I love both Crowded House and Pete Yorn, I thought that traipsing off cross-country for a rock concert when my wife is having pregnancy complications would be Bad Form.)</p>
<p>The clarinet/keyboard gadget is most likely an EWI, or Electronic Wind Instrument.  It takes the pressure data from a woodwind-style mouthpiece and uses it to modify the output parameters for softness/loudness/etc. for MIDI-driven samples.  A really cool concept, but I gave up lusting after an EWI ages ago when I realized that this meant you&#8217;d have to be an excellent keyboardist (which I really can&#8217;t claim to be) and a decent woodwind player (which I ain&#8217;t).  They&#8217;re great for making sampled wind instrument sounds come across more realistically.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m not surprised one bit by Neil being able to live on the road with Liam.  Now, bear in mind, Liam&#8217;s old enough to not be living at home anymore, but even more than that, in Neil, we&#8217;re talking about someone who has written whole albums around family relationships.  It&#8217;s obviously a subject of deep importance to him.</p>
<p>Hey Dave, did Liam&#8217;s CD have a URL or anything like that on it where a poor sod like me who couldn&#8217;t make it to the concert might order a copy?  Or is that info on the MySpace site that I probably should&#8217;ve looked at before asking this?  I really liked Liam&#8217;s worth with Betchadupa, and I&#8217;ve got a darn good start on a complete collection of Finn family CDs.  No point in falling behind now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
