Archive for December 1st, 2001

Fifteen Minutes of Your Life You Will Never Get Back

Posted December 1, 2001 By Dave Thomer

There is a rumor going around that the Internet will save you time and money and make you a more productive person. That you are reading this website at all indicates that you likely realize this claim is about as true as Michael Eisner declaring he has no ill will for DreamWorks and Jeffrey Katzenberg. Just in case you have stumbled upon this page by accident — which, when you think about it is once again all the proof I need — and still cling to the notion that your Internet Service Provider is a link to higher productivity, allow me to disabuse you of it here. You’ll thank me for it.

Now, first, I must admit, I have a somewhat unusual schedule in that many days, I have no schedule at all. I am a graduate student, and thus I spend much of my time in what is referred to as ‘independent research.’ Those of you without graduate experience probably understand this phenomenon better by its more popular name, ‘goofing off until the last minute and then cramming.’ I just do this on a recurring basis, so that the last minute seems to arrive every two days or so, and I often have to combine the cramming and the goofing off into one activity. Also, I frequently check entire shelves out of the library. But we have already lost sight of our main topic, as you should expect from a student of the liberal arts like myself. (If you are frustrated by this digression, consider it direct evidence of our central thesis — the Internet wastes time.)

One thing that I will sometimes do in the course of my day is to take care of tasks that my wife, burdened as she is by a real job, is unable to handle. So on the evening of Thursday, November 15th, I attempted to purchase movie tickets for the following night via the Internet. (If, given that date, you are unaware of what film we wished to see, I must congratulate you on your recent return from Alpha Centauri.) After several aborted attempts, in which my computer informed me it could not find the page I was looking for — it had been there a minute ago, but then another computer tried to ‘put it in a safe place’ or something — I finally hit the button marked ‘finish’ and went to bed.

I woke up to discover that ‘finish’ really meant ‘give up,’ because my computer now told me that I had not, in fact, purchased any tickets. Had to do the whole thing over again. Except now the thing really was being difficult. See, I have a code which allegedly entitles me to waive the surcharge that comes from buying movie tickets online. You input this code, then hit enter, and you are taken to a page that asks for your credit card. Only the credit card page tells you that you entered no code. You can go back and enter the code again, but the credit card page will insist that there is no code. It’s like that scene in The Matrix where someone gives Keanu Reeves a piece of mind-altering, reality-expanding advice and Keanu stares back in an intent yet uncomprehending way. You know which one I mean.

Now, the thing is, the reason I was ordering tickets online in the first place is a) the AMC Theater chain does not, to my knowledge, work with the Moviefone people to let me do this over the phone and b) everyone under the age of twelve — and half those over the age of twelve — were trying to get tickets for Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone. So each time I did this little type-the-code-there-is-no-code dance, another flargin’ show sold out and I had to try again. I spent an hour doing this before giving up, spending the rest of my day being late for appointments, and deciding in the end to just try again the next day. (We did, and the movie’s quite nifty, but that is neither here nor there.)

Of course, part of the problem may have been that, in another window, I was trying to sort out my finances. See, one result of that whole ‘independent research’ thing is that I produce lots and lots of paper. My printer often just gives up from the strain of it all, and would unionize in a heartbeat in my little anthropomorphic dream world. So I try to keep a lot of my records online, which means I have lots of things set up by which I can send money out or (occasionally) receive it with a few keystrokes. ‘Ah ha!’ you say. ‘Surely this is a convenience that saves time and money!’

Let’s think about this for a moment, though. Pattie once discussed how credit cards make it easier for us to spend money, because we don’t actually have to give up cash at the moment of purchase. Imagine how easy it is when you don’t even have to take out the credit card. Just type in an e-mail address — say, dave@conspicuousconsumption.com — and a password — like cash4unot4me — and voila! Despite being unwilling to spend an hour at the local mall because it’s too time consuming, you’ve spent two or three browsing pages at eBay buying things you would pick up and then put down at the store. (Or, if you’re me, you would pick them up, put them down, pick them again, walk to the checkout, turn around, put them back down, walk away, come back, compare the original item with a slightly different item, pick up the second item, put it down, pick up the original item, then put it down and walk sheepishly from the store when your wife gives you a look. My point remains.)

I have not discussed e-mail, which allows me to stay in touch with friends all over the country and field numerous lucrative offers to ‘Work from HOME’ from people who don’t realize I already do that, or Instant Messaging, which allows me to engage in 30-minute-long exchanges of puns centering on meteorological themes. This is not something I would put in my planner. I would not call someone up and say, “Hey, let’s have a conversation, in which every sentence incorporates a meteorological term, whose sole point is to discuss our ability to incorporate meteorological terms into sentences.” But I do it because of the darned Internet, and then I look at the clock and it’s four in the morning and I have to get to bed because I have another day of intensive research ahead of me. Speaking of which, I should be going. But before I do, remember.

There is no code.

Questions to Expect When You’re Expecting

Posted December 1, 2001 By Pattie Gillett

As most of our regular Not News readers know, Dave and I are expecting our first child in April of 2002 (or whenever he or she feels like arriving, but that’s the ballpark). Since this is our first pregnancy, there’s been a great deal for us to learn and get used to in a relatively short amount of time. (Think the “We mustn’t panic, we mustn’t panic” scene from Chicken Run.) One thing that takes a bit of patience is getting used to all the questions we (well, mostly I) get asked. All kinds of questions. I’m patient, because, frankly, I know I’ve interrogated my share of expectant mothers so it’s only fair that I take a little. Also, I know people are just plain curious. They see a belly. They know how it got there but they still want to know more.

Bottom line, I have to be patient because if I can’t have patience with this, why the heck am I having a kid? Here’s a list of my favorites:

How are you feeling? I’ve come to the conclusion that many people have a morbid fascination with morning sickness and other pregnancy-related ailments. Oh, I know most people ask this question out of genuine concern. But deep down I have to wonder that they aren’t waiting for me to wow them with tales of uncontrolled nausea at the sight of green M&M’s or swollen feet the size of Lake Michigan. There’s a great deal of pressure to impress here. I hate to disappoint them but most of the time I just feel tired. No throwing up, just sleepy . . . hey where are you going?

What are your cravings? Expect this question and the previous one to come as a set. There is still the tremendous pressure to impress, or in this case, gross someone out so much that they throw up. If you are like me, and unlucky enough to not have had any cravings, invest some time thinking some up or stealing other pregnant women’s cravings. Why get that bored look when you have to tell someone “Oh, none, really” or “Just milk, actually” (Lord, I am dull!) when you can wow them with “sauerkraut on graham crackers” or “Oreos with bean dip?” C’mon, your pride is at stake here.

How far along are you? This is a dangerous question for two reasons. One, doctors measure pregnancy in weeks, the general public does so in months – the figures never match. I’ve been pregnant about 384 weeks now — or just over five months. To amuse yourself, you can give the person who’s asking one figure and ask them to compute the other. Hours of fun, I tell you.

Secondly, if you’re being asked by a someone who has already had a baby, there will be the inevitable comparison between your size and how “big” she was at this stage. There’s no way to avoid this. If you’re carrying larger, you may get some hearty encouragement about having a “strong one” or a “bruiser.” If you’re carrying smaller, expect follow-up questions about exactly how much weight you’ve gained, what you eat, etc. How much weight you gain during pregnancy is a very political issue. If you gain less than 25 pounds, lie as much as possible. Pad that number, double it, triple it if you have to. You’ll thank me later.

Do you know if it’s a boy or girl? I know this question is inevitable but sometimes I wonder if everyone is keeping a global tally and needs my baby’s gender to meet some sort of headcount deadline. This isn’t quite so bad now that we know. I’m quite happy to share the news. Besides, it’s not like I can keep it a secret forever. Though to be honest, I got this question so early on in my pregnancy (as early as 2 weeks, can you imagine?) – I worry that there’s some “way” to know that I just missed. Was I absent the day in Sex Ed that they gave out the “Morning After Gender Decoder Rings”?

Do you have any names picked out? I cannot imagine how some parents-to-be manage to get to the end of the pregnancy without having this issue settled. You get asked this question every eight seconds or so. Good luck to you folks who’d like to keep both this and the baby’s gender a surprise because curious mobs have been known to beat at least one out of you. Yes, it’s a complicated issue — should we name the baby after someone, who should that person be? What will the family think? However, the two most important things to keep in mind when picking a name: a) how does it sound screamed across a crowded grocery store (because that’s what you’ll be doing with it most often) and b) is it “trendy” (that is, will all the kids in the store come running when you scream it)?

That, in a nutshell, has been my pregnancy thus far. I am sure that, in some strange way, dealing with these questions has helped prepare me for motherhood. I would advise most mothers-to-be to also pick up a copy of Dr. Spock’s Baby and Child Care and What to Expect When You’re Expecting. These books give you clear, understandable answers to many of your own pregnancy questions. It will give you peace of mind until you get to your doctor’s office and learn that it was all wrong anyway. Good Luck.

Racism on the Front Page

Posted December 1, 2001 By Kevin Ott

Pick up your local newspaper and flip through it. Look at all the photos. Look closely. Notice all the local pictures of nonwhites and other minorities?

Not really, huh? Well, don’t be surprised. There’s been a lack of real-life and everyday portrayals of blacks, Latinos, Asians, gays, lesbians and just about every other type of person who isn’t straight or white from the newspapers we read for quite a while now. It’s one of those things that’s nobody’s fault per se, but that we all have a responsibility in dealing with.

It’s called gatekeeping, and it’s as old as newspapers themselves.

In 1968, in the wake of bloody race riots in several major cities, a federal commission led by Illinois Governor Otto Kerner discovered what America’s black population already knew: That blacks were woefully underrepresented in the press, often featured in unflattering light, if they were featured at all. The commission’s report urged newspaper editors and publishers to diversify both their newsrooms and their coverage of minority communities.

In the intervening three and a half decades, many newspapers have performed admirably in their efforts to recruit African American reporters and present complete, balanced coverage of their community’s black populations. Unfortunately, these efforts haven’t brought newspapers within range of their projected goals, according to the American Society of Newspaper Editors (ASNE), and within the past year, the number of minorities in the workplace has actually decreased from 11.85 percent to 11.64 percent. Read the remainder of this entry »

You Know What I Mean

Posted December 1, 2001 By Dave Thomer

There are a couple of interesting threads in our Philosophy forums right now on the nature of an individual’s relationship to society and on the nature of language; while the technicalities of these topics may make them seem like two separate issues, many philosophers have tried to show that they are, in fact, vitally connected. One such philosopher is George Herbert Mead, a colleague of John Dewey in the late nineteenth century. Mead refers to his philosophy as ‘social behaviorism,’ and emphasizes the importance of gestures and actions, not just for human beings but for other creatures in the natural world. (In this discussion, I’m drawing from http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0226516687/thisisnotnews, an edited version of Mead’s lectures.)
Read the remainder of this entry »